Read the whole thing but the last paragraph sums it up for me...
“Backers of no-refusal point out that the police secure warrants before the invasive testing, but often the justification for the warrant is flimsy at best,” Bowman said. “And remember, we’re not talking about breath tests here. We’re talking about taking a person’s blood, sometimes against their will. This has the potential to become a gross violation of personal privacy.”
http://dailysign.al/1m8NXPo
“Backers of no-refusal point out that the police secure warrants before the invasive testing, but often the justification for the warrant is flimsy at best,” Bowman said. “And remember, we’re not talking about breath tests here. We’re talking about taking a person’s blood, sometimes against their will. This has the potential to become a gross violation of personal privacy.”
http://dailysign.al/1m8NXPo
RSS Feed